Menu•SiteMap | Ministry





The Knowledge of the Son of God
Later Ministry by G. R. Cowell
– Part Five

 
The Knowledge of the
Son of God
The System, Position
and Path
Activities in which We are
to Engage
The Priest with Urim and
Thummin
The Shepherd and Bishop
of our Souls
"God is One"
To: Previous   Next
 



THE  KNOWLEDGE
OF  THE  SON  OF  GOD
1 John 5: 5, 20
Hebrews 1: 1-5, 10-13; 4: 14; 5: 5-6; 10: 5-7
Psalm 110: 3-4, 7
Address at Bournemouth, May 9, 1962
The Knowledge of the Son of God, Notes of Meetings, 7: 1-19


G. R. Cowell, 1898-1963

I wish to say a word, dear brethren, on the verse,

I am sure that it is a verse that rings a note of exultation in every one of our hearts. We can lift up our heads in face of every foe.

Earlier in the epistle John tells us that the Son of God has been manifested to undo the works of the devil.

What a colossal task then is the complete taking away of sin, and therefore the undoing of the works of the devil in every sphere including

In the next chapter he shows that living by the faith of the Son of God is synonymous with walking in the Spirit, because when he applies it to the Galatians he says,

The Son of God came to undo the works of the devil, and Paul preached the Son of God as soon as he was converted,

Some people think that living by faith is living by trust, that it is just a question of trusting God about your circumstances, and that such a man is a man of faith;

All this is very wonderful. So one would desire that we might be in victory.

Now Hebrews deals, among other things, with the incarnation; and one thing that is very wonderful is that

He was perfect in it, but being perfected means that He had to go through experiences as Man which He could not have had in Godhead, in order to be qualified for certain offices.

And then may we move on to other expressions which are disclosed to us – I am not referring to them all. At the end of Hebrews 1 it says,

And then if you go on to resurrection we are again led into divine communications,

And so we see that Jesus the Son of God is the centre of a vast system.

Paul’s ministry is to bring us to it that the Christ might dwell, through faith, in our hearts. What does that mean?

Hebrews 8 speaks of “the sanctuary a worldly one” meaning as JND points out, the holy universal order, that is

Some may prefer a mixed kind of Christianity; there is plenty of it all around us, but it is not the Christian altar.

So chapter 4 views the Lord Jesus going in from our side. It speaks of what we have,

You can understand that anyone living in the faith of this would be in victory.

But then there is God’s side of the matter and the Lord’s side, and I just read in Psalm 110 on this account.

Then in verse 7. “He shall drink of the brook in the way”.

Well, may we know this in abundant measure, not merely for our sakes but for His sake and for the sake of God’s great Name!

Page Top   Article Top

THE  SYSTEM,
POSITION  AND  PATH
Hebrews 8: 1-2
1 Corinthians 3: 9, 16-17; 12: 13, 16-18
2 Timothy 2: 22
Reading at Alnwick, January 6, 1962
The Knowledge of the Son of God, Notes of Meetings, 7: 38-65

G.R.C. I thought we might dwell on three things, the system, the position, and the path.

The verses in Hebrews refer to the divine system, that is the true tabernacle which the Lord has pitched and not man.

The scriptures read in Corinthians refer to the position, that is something established in a concrete way down here, namely the body of Christ and the house of God.

But then there is the path; this involves fellowship, as it says,

Commonly when we speak of the system nowadays we mean a system gradually built up over the years and in which we have moved, and which we have had to leave.

F.A.B. Would you say that although the tabernacle that was set up has ceased to exist, what it represented goes through?

G.R.C. Yes, what it represented is the true tabernacle, the other is only a type and a shadow, but we belong to the real thing, the true tabernacle which the Lord has pitched and not man.

Ques. Do I understand that every believer belongs to the body?

G.R.C. Everyone who has the Spirit, yes.

A.W. Was the tabernacle pitched in Acts 2?

G.R.C. Yes, the Lord pitched it then. In fact, He had already put it together, as it were, because the disciples were all together with one accord in one place;

F.A.B. Would you say in regard to Acts 2, whether the Spirit given consequent on the Lord’s ascension, involved the economy?

G.R.C. Yes, I suppose it required the Spirit to be given to enable us vitally to enter into the gain of the economy, but the economy was seen at the Lord’s baptism, for instance.

  1. one, the truth of the economy, the manifestation of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, the Persons being brought before us objectively in their relative places in the economy;

  2. and then as that Name is one, it means that the Persons thus known in the economy are co-equal in the oneness of Deity, commanding our worship. It is a wonderful Name!

T.F. Would it be right as to Hebrews 8 to say that the Lord is the One distinguished in this system, having in mind the verse, “We have such a one high priest”?

G.R.C. Well, there is what we have and what God has. From our side “we have such a one high priest”.

Ques. Is it stabilising to see that our apprehension of God’s thoughts may vary, but His thoughts never fail,

G.R.C. That is right. Our apprehension may vary, and does; and gifts are given with a view to our arriving at the unity of the faith.

H.B. Is that suggested in the note to the word “summary” – in chapter 8: 1 – in the reference to the substance of what is in the speaker’s mind?

G.R.C. Yes, because however young we are in the faith, if we once apprehend the Person who upholds the system

W.B.F. Does a person give character to a system? At the outset Nimrod gave his character to a system of things.

G.R.C. Yes, and what is so precious is that the Person who gives character to this system is a Divine Person in whom dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, so that it must be in every way in accord with God.

A.F. Is that why it is stated that He is Minister of it?

G.R.C. Say some more.

A.F. I was thinking that if He is the One who inaugurated it, He is the One capable of being the Minister of it.

G.R.C. That is just it. He is the Inaugurator in chapter 1; we see that He inaugurated the physical creation too –

F.A.B. So you would say that it enhances the dignity of the saints to take account of the glorious Person who is the Head of it all.

G.R.C. It does. Some days ago I was thinking of that beautiful hymn:

‘Thousand thousand saints attending
Swell the triumph of His train’

and I thought, a thousand thousand, that is a million, and we know there are many more than that,

F.A.B. It has been a great comfort to me to consider the dignity that attaches to having any part at all in this glorious system, in which God is served.

G.R.C. And that would stimulate us to attend to the priestly office. It says in Numbers,

A.F. Are you thinking of chapter 10 now?

G.R.C. Yes, chapter 10 is our going in, and chapter 13 our coming out to the altar, “We have an altar”, and by Him offering the sacrifice of praise to God.

Rem. What you say encourages us to see that each one of us has the right and the privilege to go in.

G.R.C. Well, let us enter into the holiest far more often than we have ever done. It is the true Christian place to be there in the presence of the glorified Man who is before God.

A.F. In virtue of His precious blood – how blessed!

G.R.C. Yes, it is His sacrifice and service that takes us into the holiest; His offering of Himself on the altar; we can go straight in.

P.S. Is that suggested in that He has sat down on the right hand of the throne of the greatness in the heavens? He is in the place of power.

G.R.C. His work is done; the way is open for us.

H.B. Is that why Peter sets out the holy priesthood first, and then the royal priesthood? You go in to God before you go out to men.

G.R.C. Yes, that is the point. Our place is in the holy of holies; that is true Christian ground; it belongs to only the Christian company.

H.V. Does all this come as a challenge to us? One feels for oneself the sense of failure to maintain that outlook.

G.R.C. Well, I wish I had more of a heart for Christ and for God, because I cannot say much about it. But truly it should be our first waking thought. Our highest duty is the priest’s office.

W.L.M. Would that link with what you were saying on Thursday night about the props being taken away. Have we not really been leaning on a man-made system?

G.R.C. That is just it. The system we have relied on has gone, but the divine system stands and will stand, in all its grandeur.

Rem. Daniel’s practice was not altered by the props being removed.

G.R.C. And we have often thought about the refugees from Jerusalem in Acts 8; saints were scattered through the persecution by Saul.

F.A.B. Does what you say help us to appreciate something of the wonderful things we have come to at the end of chapter 12, things that go through? So that the tabernacle, the system, is even referred to in Revelation – these things go right through.

G.R.C. That is right; the true tabernacle goes through into the eternal state.

P.S. I was thinking of the reference “which the Lord has pitched, and not man”. We need to seek divine help and discernment in relation to that.

G.R.C. We do not want to start again pitching any tent. It seems clear in the Acts that there was no human organisation.

The Holy Spirit said to Philip, “Approach and join this chariot” – He told persons what to do at the moment.

W.L.M. I was just going to refer to that, having in mind particularly Mr. Charles Stanley.

G.R.C. And I suppose that in those days that principle marked all; because nobody directed JND.

A.W. What would help us to be in the state whereby we could be available to the Spirit at a moment’s notice?

G.R.C. Well, just to accept the injunction, “Be filled with the Spirit”. It is put on me and you; the Spirit is here wanting to fill everyone, so it says in effect, The Spirit is here, and we should just be filled!

T.D. You would say the difficulty lies sometimes in wanting to organise, but, if we were living simply, relying on the Spirit, it would be a different matter altogether as regards activity.

G.R.C. Yes, there would not be too much or too little.

A.F. Have we to have the sense in our souls as it reminds us in 1 Corinthians 3 that, “We are God’s fellow-workmen”, involving control and communion?

G.R.C. I am glad you have brought us to that; it is the second part of our subject, that is, the thought of the position.

F.A.B. Is it a comfort to get hold of the light of the position, so as to be practically in it? You said earlier that ‘we are, if we are’.

G.R.C. Yes, but I was referring to being in the fellowship – we are, if we are.

F.A.B. What you are bringing before us now are positive statements.

G.R.C. Yes, God has made me a member of the body of Christ, and that is true of every Christian who has the Spirit, whether he understands it or not –

H.B. Is not the reference to God’s activities very touching in that connection? “God’s husbandry, God’s building” – what can shake that?

G.R.C. Quite so. And he says later,

P.S. So we are besought in Romans 12, “Present your bodies a living sacrifice”.

G.R.C. Yes. We have been put in a wonderful position by God. But, do we know it? Does it have its effect on our bodies?

Rem. On the one hand, if we held our bodies in that way we would be sensitive to the Spirit’s leading.

G.R.C. We certainly would.

Rem. On the other hand, because we are not always in our right state or condition, we do not use our bodies rightly.

G.R.C. That is it, and you see that brings in the thought of fellowship and the path.

H.R.A. Is that where the breakdown comes in?

G.R.C. Yes, the position is a matter of God’s grace; the path is a matter of our responsibility; but if we are to enjoy the position, we must be in the path.

A.W. You are suggesting that not every Christian is in the fellowship of God’s Son?

G.R.C. No, but he is called into it. The things God has put us in by His own grace are one thing, and the things to which we are called are another.

H.B. We need God’s word as a lamp unto our path.

G.R.C. Yes, we do; God’s word illuminates the path.

T.F. Does verse 11 of chapter 3 show how stable the system is fundamentally?

G.R.C. The foundation is impregnable. What we build is going to be tested and some of it may be burned up, but all that is of God will stand on that foundation.

Ques. “Shall two walk together except they be agreed?” How is it that there has been such disagreement?

G.R.C. It all comes down to natural minds working instead of giving place to the Spirit. If we were really led by the Spirit –

F.A.B. Going back to your thought of the temple, I was wondering whether, visualising the tabernacle system, it helps to see that the lamps were shining

G.R.C. I am sure it would. The manifestations of the Spirit in 1 Corinthians 12 are like the lamps shining. It says,

A.F. So the Spirit never moves except in relation to God, does He? Whatever He says or does, it is for the heart of God Himself.

G.R.C. Yes, it is.

A.F. Any contribution has as its objective what is for God’s glory, and the Spirit’s movements are to that end.

G.R.C. You get in Corinthians the thought of worship by the simple person, something secured for God as the manifestation of the Spirit takes place.

A.M. The simple person would be encouraged though not rooted and founded in knowledge and intelligence. He would however be rooted and founded in love.

G.R.C. Yes; we ought to remember that all through our lives. After all, what really gives us intelligence, is love, not in the working of our brains.

F.A.B. Have we been making too much of truth being the bond, instead of love – both are needed?

G.R.C. Well, love is the bond of perfectness.

F.A.B. And faith works through love, does it not?

G.R.C. I think we need to get these things clear in our minds.

  1. First, the system;

  2. secondly, the position, what we are down here, our position as members of the body of Christ and belonging to the house of God;

  3. then thirdly, the question is as to the path suited to those in that position; and unless we tread the path suited to the position, we shall not enjoy the position.

Ques. There can be no suggestion of ecclesiastical pretension, can there?

G.R.C. No. The position is set out; you do not need to presume or pretend to anything.

A.F. And the Spirit is here to help you.

P.S. So that the matter of the mind to which you have referred is challenged in 1 Corinthians 3.

G.R.C. No, no place at all. It is through our having the Spirit that we have the mind of Christ. It is not a question of natural ability.

F.A.B. Are you free to go on to your later thought?

G.R.C. That involves the question of the true path consistent with the position. The true path is really the path of fellowship, walking together,

F.A.B. So would our maintenance of the instruction in chapter 10, which is the table in the wilderness and the responsible side, help us to enter into the enjoyment of the privileges of the fellowship as enunciated in chapter 11?

G.R.C. That is just it. In chapter 11, if things are right, we enjoy the reality of being members of the body of Christ,

A.W. Was Paul in fellowship with the altar when in Galatians 6 he said God forbid that he should glory save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ by which the world was crucified to him and he to the world? Was that fellowship with the altar?

G.R.C. Yes, the altar means we are determined to have nothing to do with the old man who was crucified.

T.D. Paul said too, “I am crucified with Christ”, Galatians 2.

G.R.C. All that Paul was that could be described as the old man was crucified with Christ.

A.F. Have we to get a sense of the price? Paul says, “Ye have been bought with a price”; he says, “ye are not your own”, 1 Corinthians 6: 20.

G.R.C. Yes; “with a price”. What it has cost God to constitute this position, and to put us in it through His grace!

F.A.B. So it is remarkable that in regard of the legal position dealt with in Galatians, the cross comes in so forcibly in chapters 2 and 3, and then powerfully at the end, to which our brother referred,

G.R.C. Yes. The way the enemy works is to revive our old man and seek to make him acceptable and appear all right by putting on legal dress.

H.B. Paul says, “Then the scandal of the cross has been done away”, Galatians 5: 11.

G.R.C. Yes. And, you know, fellowship with the altar is a matter of affection, as everything is in Christianity. After saying,

P.S. Would what you are now saying bear on our High Priest being able to sympathise with our infirmities, and feeling with us in relation to our desires to be pleasing to Him, though ofttimes failing?

G.R.C. Yes. He feels everything; He is a tender High Priest.

A.F. Yes; the Lord knew their affection for Him, underneath all the failure. Peter said, “Lord, thou knowest all things, thou knowest that I love thee”.

G.R.C. Quite so. Was not the difficulty that he thought he loved Him most, that he loved Him more than the others?

A.F. “And likewise said they all too”. The fact is we all fail.

Ques. Does this bring us to “the communion of the blood of the Christ”? Is that an appeal to our affections?

G.R.C. It is an appeal to our affections. As Paul says,

H.B. “Which we bless”, is that characteristic, and not necessarily at the Supper? Is it an attitude of mind?

G.R.C. Well, that is what it should be. Every day of the week we are thinking of it.

P.S. So that what we do during the week takes character from the altar?

G.R.C. Yes, it does. The altar makes its tremendous appeal to our affections, and so we would love to be in communion with the altar.

F.A.B. I was thinking that. It is being said that we may only eat with those with whom we can eat the Lord's Supper.

G.R.C. Yes, “whatever ye do”, you have in mind communion with the altar. Colossians says,

F.A.B. That would maintain us in the joy and blessedness of what you earlier referred to, would it not?

G.R.C. Yes, if we are walking in this way, if this is governing us, you have the liberty of the house – the house was morally based, as it were, on the altar.

F.A.B. You cannot vitally get into the house save by way of the altar – you cannot bypass the altar, can you?

G.R.C. No, and you would not have liberty in the house even though belonging to it, if you ignored the altar.

Ques. We have to be regulated during the week according to the Supper, have we not?

G.R.C. I think that is the point here,

Rem. The Psalmist says, “I will wash my hands in innocency, and will encompass thine altar, O Jehovah”, Psalm 26: 6.

G.R.C. Well, you see, the priest always started at the laver.

A.M. In Matthew 5, in approaching the altar, we would be sensitive, “and there shouldest remember”.

G.R.C. That is a simple matter, it is not a thing to be fearful of.

Ques. Do we all need constant cleansing as passing through this evil world – there is not a special class that is clean and exempt?

G.R.C. We all need to see that we have got clean hands and a pure heart, but we can and are under obligation to wash one another’s feet.

W.B.F. Do you think that in seeking to wash one another’s feet, we would seek to refresh one another as sympathetically appreciating that each one is tested by the wilderness path?

G.R.C. That is it. Our hearts go out to the brethren – all of them – just as the Lord’s did,

F.A.B. It has been said that the most effective way to wash one another’s feet is not by setting out to do it but by a ministry of Christ, and thus you do it unconsciously.

G.R.C. You are set to help the saints all you can, your mind is always that way.

Ques. Is there a moral way to it?

G.R.C. Well, as we have said, in the measure in which we are in the path we can enjoy the position.

P.S. We are to flee certain things and pursue others.

G.R.C. It really involves first love. A pure heart involves, in some degree, recovery to first love. Christ is the unmingled Object of the heart; no mixed motives.

A.F. We are to be a sweet savour of Christ to God, are we not?

G.R.C. That is helpful. It is wonderful to think of Paul’s part, on the one hand a sweet savour of Christ to God,

A.W. Is Paul’s pure heart emphasised in Philippians 3,

G.R.C. Yes, what a pure heart Paul had! He could say,

Page Top   Article Top   Next Article