Menu•SiteMap |
Ministry
Separation
and other
Ministry by C. W. Cooper
Although little personal information is available as to him, 'Charlie' Cooper, of Belfast, was well known among the brethren as a poet.
- He has three fine hymns – No.'s 283, 494 and 530 – in the 1973 Hymn Book and the 1993 Supplement.
- He is also wrote Beholding that Sight which appears on Poetry: The Alpha and Omega, along with several others of his poems.
In December 1960, "in order to maintain a good conscience before God", Mr. Cooper withdrew from what he judged was "becoming a sect".
It is interesting to consider the circumstances of each of the three items presented here:
1. Separation – in 1950, before the death of JT Senior in 1953 – is a balanced presentation in accord with the outlook of brethren of that time and earlier.
- Separation is not a popular subject. Many think it is merely negative, but separation from evil is necessary because of God's holiness.
- "Be ye holy, for I am holy", 1 Peter 1: 18, Leviticus 19: 2. This is hardly negative.
- That exhortation is not merely to individuals but to brethren collectively as called to be "a holy priesthood" and "a holy nation", 1 Peter 2: 5, 9.
- Of course, to merely be separate without it springing from devotion and love to the Lord Jesus would be pharisaism.
2. Tears – just a month after the 1959 London meetings – at which CWC was present – which heralded the beginning of the legal era – and presaged the sorrow soon to come upon the brethren.
- This address was at Dublin – where the revival had begun with joy, just over 130 year earlier.
3. Christian Unity and Fellowship – 1962, after his withdrawal from the legal sect – in his local meeting – shows his unwavering commitment to the truth in spite of what he calls "the shaking through which we have recently passed".
4. The Son of God – This undated item – received May 2009 – seems to be a wriitten article not an address.
5. Cleaving – 1962 – as article no. 3 – after his withdrawal from the legal sect – an address at Bournemouth – also shows his unwavering commitment to the truth in what he calls "days of extraordinary difficulty".
G.A.R.
Page Top
| SEPARATION
|
1 Chronicles 12: 8; Numbers 8: 13-15;
Nehemiah 13: 1-3; 1 Chronicles 25: 1, 2, 6-7
Address at London, December 26, 1950
Words of Grace and Comfort, 1951, 27: 97-107 |
I desire to speak on the thought of separation. About 130 years ago there was published a tract which had widespread effects throughout Christendom;
- The Spirit used it, and all over the world there came to pass the most
wonderful recovery in the history of the church, and in this recovery
– brought about in God's mercy and grace – we have part.
- This recovery has continued until now, and I suppose there is not one principle that has been so much attacked by the enemy from that day to this, and is being attacked at the present times, as this principle of separation.
- That is why it has been impressed upon me to speak about it tonight.
Brethren at that time acted on the Scripture in 2 Timothy, which refers to vessels to dishonour and says,
- "If therefore one shall have purified himself from these, in separating himself from them …"
There was a time in the history of Christendom when the church could effectively deal with evil by putting away wicked persons,
- but conditions in 2 Timothy days have become so bad that the servant of the Lord who still desires to be faithful finds a way to escape by separating himself from such persons.
- So in those early days of the last century brethren acted in the light of this important principle of separation, and we can see that God has abundantly confirmed it.
- It is for us to see to it that we are maintaining this principle that they recovered for us.
- It can be said of us that other men have laboured and we have entered into their labour, John 4: 38,
- and God is expecting that what is committed to us from those who have been before us in the testimony should be continued and maintained in power, so that,
- if the Lord leaves us here, we may be able to pass on to others the principles that we, in our measure, have sought to maintain.
I have remarked already on what constant opposition there has been to this principle. That very fact alone should convince us that the principle is of God.
- The Bible is constantly attacked, because men know it is the truth, and,
- on the same account, this principle of separation is the cause of constant attack, and even imitation.
- Not long after that recovery had come to pass, the enemy set up a rival system, imitating this idea of separation, but it did not go far enough.
- I often think of a time in David's history when he had to act on this principle, and when he fled from Jerusalem. It says,
The early brethren, too, had to stand against current conditions in Christendom, but the enemy, not long after, brought about a system which might well be described as a half-way house.
- In case there should be a believer here seeking his way, I ask you to consider what is being said now, so as to avoid this half-way house, so that you may find your way to the "remote house". As we see with David, God supported it.
Now the Scriptures are full of this thought of separation, but for certain reasons I have limited myself to these four, as conveying something of what is in mind just now.
1 Chronicles 12
In 1 Chronicles 12 it says, "And of the Gadites, there separated themselves to David in the stronghold in the wilderness",
- and that Scripture I want to use to appeal to the young people here that they might make a full and definite committal to the Lord in
- "the stronghold in the wilderness"
- which answers to the Corinthian position.
- It is a fortified position and bears on our position in a military sense.
- In this city of London and in other cities too, there is the evidence of a stronghold, secured by separation.
- It is maintained by separating to the Lord, not to any religious company or a nice congregation of people, but to a Person.
We are often occupied with the negative side of separation: we think of all the places we cannot go to, and of invitations we have to refuse, but it is really a matter of separating to the Lord.
- He is supporting a position in the wilderness, and we therefore want to be in that position wholeheartedly.
- I link it up with the Corinthian position, which suggests a military setting, as it says here,
- "men fit for the service of war".
- The earlier verses, down to verse 7, are like Romans – the kingdom – where it is a question of standing in our individual setting, confessing Christ in the office, at school, or at home.
- When we come to this fortified position, something more systematic is suggested in "the service of war". We have now committed ourselves to a military position.
- A soldier does not fight just when he feels like it, but he is entirely committed to the conflict. So in our case the separate position is in conflict and we are in the conflict with it.
- Is that true of all? Have we all committed ourselves wholeheartedly in our localities? That is where the Lord expects us to be thoroughly in the conflict.
So it says of these men, "armed with shield and spear; whose faces were like the faces of lions". There was moral courage with them, and that is a feature very necessary for the conflict. Then it says,
- "who were swift as the gazelles upon the mountains".
- They were not only marked by courage, but alertness as to anything that would be a challenge to David, their rightful lord and king.
- Does that mark us in our localities? Have we not often mourned how slow we have been to take up matters; how the enemy, through our delay, has gained a foothold he would not otherwise have had?
- I am not seeking to discourage the brethren, but I desire that we might all be exercised to be marked by courage and alertness in meeting the attack of the enemy in anything that would be a challenge to the rights of the Lord
Jesus.
The position of the stronghold goes down to verse 22. In verses 16-18, we read that there were some "of the children of Benjamin and Judah".
- The children of Benjamin, of which tribe Saul came, and of Judah to which tribe David belonged, represent people who might have been marked by merely natural motives.
- David wanted to make sure that they came because of love and loyalty to him, and we have to search our hearts as to whether true love for Christ is marking us as we commit ourselves to this position.
- David says, "but if to betray me to mine enemies!" What a challenge!
- In the position of conflict, in the stronghold in the wilderness, it is possible there may be traitors. You know how in history traitors are regarded with shame and contempt.
- What about our standing for Christ? Have we sometimes allowed the spirit of treachery or betrayal? I believe it is well for us to question ourselves as to our loyalty to Christ.
- May we be able to answer as this man in verse 18:
- "And the Spirit came upon Amasai, the chief of the captains, and he said, Thine are we, David, and with thee, thou son of Jesse: Peace, peace be to thee! And peace be to thy helpers! For thy God helps thee".
- That is, he saw that though the position outwardly was small – nothing palatial marked the stronghold in the wilderness – God was helping.
- So we can see that God is helping His people as they seek to move on these lines, in the various localities where they are found.
- Then as we realize that God is helping, we want to help, as verse 22 says,
- "there came men to David to help him".
- How can we do that? By a full committal to this stronghold position.
There are several references to 'captains' in the chapter. I believe it is to suggest that they were men prepared to accept responsibility, men who give a lead, who "take the lead", as the Scripture says.
- A captain does not push himself forward, but he is not afraid of accepting responsibility.
- The time of rewards has not come yet. The Lord Himself is waiting the final vindication, but in that day to come there will be abundant compensation.
Numbers 8
In Numbers we again find this thought of separation. Indeed it is emphasised in Numbers, for in this book we have the assembly in the wilderness.
- Earlier in chapter 6 the idea of separation is mentioned in connection with the Nazarite, but in chapter 8 it is in connection with the Levites, those who serve the saints.
- We might almost say that more rigid separation is called for in those who serve; not merely separation from evil as in an earlier Scripture, or separation from the world, but
- they had to go through a course which involved sacrifice, bringing home to them the deep, practical meaning of the death of Christ.
It says, "Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying, Take the Levites from among the children of Israel" – which suggests God's sovereignty – "and thus shalt thou do unto them".
- The first idea is the sprinkling upon them the water of purification from sin.
- From chapter 19 of this book we have some idea of what the water of purification suggests – man after the flesh entirely set aside in the death of Christ;
- whether it be man in weakness or man in all his dignity, all has to go.
- That is where many make a mistake. Sometimes we are inclined to do as Saul did; we read that he put to death all that was weak and mean but spared the choicest of the sheep and oxen.
- Jehovah had said that all was to go – there is no thought
of selection. This is easy to say, but not so easy to work out in
practice.
Now this chapter goes on to say,
- "they shall pass the razor over all their flesh".
- That means to say that the one who is serving the saints must be exceedingly careful to apply the sharp knife to all those features that are natural to him,
- not necessarily evil features, but what might mark him as a man in the flesh.
- I am sure we have seen this exemplified in those who have served the saints in these days.
- A man who passes the razor over all his flesh is not marked by anything to distinguish him naturally. It would deprive him of many things he might boast of.
- Absalom boasted in the hair of his head which distinguished him in a remarkable way in Israel.
- On the other hand Paul did not want to be distinguished by anything natural but his service was in demonstration of the Spirit and of power.
- I know as much as any the tendency for the natural to intrude in one's service, but what is suggested in these verses is that the natural is dealt with so as to make way for the Spirit.
- Any tendency to be comic or dramatic only distinguishes the natural at the expense of the spiritual.
Then it says, verse 7, "and shall wash their garments, and make
themselves clean".
- This applies to the surroundings and associations of the Levite; he must be careful that there is nothing allowed to deprive him of power of service amongst the saints.
- Then it speaks of their service, verse 22:
- "afterwards the Levites came in to perform their service … before Aaron, and before his sons".
- That is something that those who serve should notice, that the Levites are called upon to serve before Aaron, and before his sons.
- The saints are regarded as spiritual and priestly persons; so our service is not only before God and before the Lord, but before the saints, and they form a judgment of our service; it is right that they should.
- It says, "Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge", 1 Corinthians 14: 29.
- The saints form a judgment both of the servants and the service.
- As one moves on this line of separation, cleansing and purification, he will secure their commendation – a most important matter.
- I would appeal to the young brethren here tonight, that they might be concerned as to what spiritual persons think of their service.
- Consider what the Lord thinks surely, but take into account what the spiritual think also.
Nehemiah 13
Turning to the Scripture in Nehemiah, I might say that, in these two books – Ezra and Nehemiah – which belong to a broken day, the idea of separation is emphasised.
- In the days in which these prophets lived the idea of separation was not being maintained, so I want to show how it applies to us today.
- We can understand a little the Lord's jealousy as to anything that would be a challenge to His rights, anything that would defile or weaken the priestly service that is going on to God our Father.
- This chapter has especially that in mind; purification is going on in view of the offering in the last section of the chapter. Nehemiah says,
- "I purified them from all foreigners, and appointed the charges of the priests and the Levites, every one in his service; and for the wood-offering, at times appointed, and for the first-fruits", Nehemiah 13: 30-31.
- The idea is that there should be a pure offering. We are told in Malachi 3: 4:
- "Then shall the oblation of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto Jehovah, as in the days of old".
- As I remarked, the Lord is constantly raising this matter of separation as in the last chapter of Nehemiah, which is perhaps almost at the end of the Old Testament history.
- I mention that because I think we are in similar times now, very near the return of our Lord Jesus Christ. We shall soon see the One about whom we
were singing, who suffered in order to save us.
- We have never seen Him yet, but we shall very shortly see Him; and our desire is that in the little while we are left here we may stand in fidelity to Him.
- In these days of Ezra and Nehemiah the people had not been so careful
in their associations, and so this matter is raised definitely now by
Nehemiah, and the whole chapter deals with this matter of separation.
I just wish to make an appeal so that,
- if there is anything we are allowing that we would be ashamed of if the Lord Jesus were to come tonight,
- we might deal with it ourselves – separate from that mixture that so often marks us.
- "They separated from Israel all the mixed multitude", Nehemiah 13: 3.
- Israel stands for the saints according to the purpose of God.
- These people, as realising all the precious thoughts of God in relation to their calling, began to separate themselves from all that was beneath the dignity of their position.
- There may be something in the lives of many that might well be scrutinised in view of the nearness of the return of the Lord Jesus.
- We often sing, "At Thy call may we be ready". Would we be ready
should the Lord Jesus come tonight? Would we be ashamed of anything allowed secretly that the brethren are not aware of?
The chapter then goes on to tell us what the mixture was.
- "Eliashib the priest, who had the oversight of the chambers of the house of our God, a kinsman of Tobijah, had prepared for him a great chamber, where formerly they laid the oblations …", Nehemiah 13: 4-5.
- That would speak of natural preferences we might allow which would be a definite hindrance in the service of God.
- The result of this link was that, where formerly the oblations were, there was a chamber prepared for this kinsman.
- You know how that works out. Perhaps natural links, mixed marriages or such-like things which cause the offerings to suffer, and the response to Divine Persons is not so fresh as it used to be.
- If there is to be a full response to our God and Father, it can only be as we find all our springs in Zion.
- "The singers as the dancers shall say, All my springs are in thee", Psalm 87: 7.
Then attention is called to "the men of Tyre" – verse 16 – a mixture in relation to business matters.
- How careful we need to be in our links when dealing with men of Tyre!
- We know how advantageous it might seem to be to form such links in business, but we have to remember the service of God is going to suffer – I am quite convinced of that.
- The Lord is raising this question in order that we might be
- "purified from all foreigners".
The next matter is in verse 23:
- "I saw Jews that had married wives of Ashdod, of Ammon, and of Moab".
- Ammon and Moab are nations that represent those not fully committed to the truth.
- The men of Ashdod were Philistines; Ammon and Moab were religious enemies, and links with such people definitely hinder us in God's
service.
- So the Lord has many times in our day stressed that this principle of separation must be held faithfully amongst us.
- Men of God who have gone before have given up much in order to stand for
the truth.
- Have we given up anything in our day to maintain what has
been committed to us?
1 Chronicles 25
Finally I refer to 1 Chronicles 25, a suitable Scripture at this time, for it deals with the service of song.
- "David and the captains of the host separated for the service those of the sons of Asaph and of Heman and of Jeduthun who were to prophesy with harps and lutes and cymbals".
- We referred in our first Scripture to the service of the war, but we are on a higher level now; we are engaged with the service of song, and the important idea of separation comes in in that connection also.
- We have it before us now in connection with the present revision [1951] of our hymn book.
- It is not simply that David and the captains were concerned to separate from what was evil, but they were concerned that the response might be in
every way suited to the truth.
- They were to prophesy with harps and lutes and cymbals – a very strong word meaning that the mind of God was conveyed in the song. It fits in with what is current amongst the saints.
- The brethren are concerned that there should be excluded from our hymn book anything that would not rightly represent the mind and truth of God, a very excellent thought.
- So it says in verse 6 and 7,
- "All these were under the direction of their fathers … And the number of them, with their brethren that were instructed in the songs of Jehovah, all of them skilful, was two hundred and eighty-eight".
- That is what is proceeding, that there might be intelligence and instruction in the service of our God.
- The Spirit is helping us in that connection and it is something we might be well concerned about, not only that we may have a hymn book by which we might respond to God the Father,
- but that we might be skilful in the use of it when it comes to us, that we might be "expert ones", as the footnote suggests.
I should remark that the names of these men are exceedingly instructive, and very suggestive. What is to be noted is that the name of Jah occurs in so many of them.
- One of them means 'Jah is great'; another means 'Fame of God', and another means 'Strength of God '.
- It is all in view of what is said in verse 5,
- "All these were sons of Heman the king's seer in the words of God, to exalt His power".
Many of our hymns in the past have been marked perhaps by a good deal of feeling, but there was too much about ourselves in them.
- We may be occupied too much with our blessings; we want to be on a more elevated line than that, "to exalt His power", making much of the fame and greatness of our God.
- That is the end before the brethren, that just before the close of our
dispensation there might be a suitable flow of praise back
- to our Lord Jesus, the One who died;
- to the Holy Spirit, who has served us so well and faithfully throughout the dispensation;
- and, above all, to our God and Father who is supreme in this economy of love.
- The whole idea is that God in His greatness and supremacy may be magnified. What a blessed end to keep before us!
- As we enjoy something of this liberty in the service of song our judgment would be that separation is worth while.
- In view then of the service of our God and Father, may we all be exercised to be separate from everything evil,
- and even from things merely natural or sentimental which would weaken our response to God!
May the Lord bless His word!
Page Top
| TEARS
|
2 Timothy 1: 1-4; Psalm 42: 1-3;
2 Kings 20: 1-5; Revelation 21: 1-4; Psalm 56: 8
Address at Dublin, August 22, 1959
Words of Grace and Comfort, 1960, 36: 214-24 |
What is before me tonight will be sobering rather than exhilarating. Nevertheless, I trust it will be profitable for us all.
- It is said in the book of Ecclesiastes
- "Vexation is better than laughter".
- That is what the wise man of Ecclesiastes said, and he adds,
- "for by the sadness of the countenance the heart is made better".
- That Scripture is one we might well think of, because sooner or later there are times in all our histories when we have sadness of heart.
So it is my desire to speak about tears. All the passages read refer to them and what I have in mind is governed by the Scripture in Psalm 56.
- The psalmist there, in the midst of his wanderings, says to God,
- "Put Thou my tears into Thy bottle: are they not in Thy book?"
- I would desire to speak for the encouragement of the brethren, young and old, about tears that go into God's bottle, tears that find a place in God's book.
- It is encouraging that in times of sadness of countenance there is something being worked out, so that God is able to put tears into His bottle.
- Not every tear goes into God's bottle; not all weeping finds a place in God's book,
- but the tears mentioned in the Scriptures in Timothy and in Psalm 42 and in Kings are all tears of the kind that will be treasured in God's bottle.
- If there is sadness of countenance with us it is with the intent that there might be something secured for God's pleasure.
There is an injunction in Exodus 22 from God, through Moses, to the people of Israel, that they were not to delay the outflow of their winepress, and
- the footnote says that outflow is really tears –
- "thou shall not delay the tears of thy winepress".
- God has in mind that in our tears there might be an outflow, that there might be some gain from the pressure and some spoil for the service of God.
- The winepress is not part of God's purpose, but it is a very essential part of His ways, because, such as we are, sadness works better results than laughter. The winepress often works results that could never be secured in any other way.
- There are psalms whose heading includes the word Gittith, a
word which means winepress.
Indeed, in relation to this matter of tears the Lord Jesus, as in everything else, takes the first place.
- Think of what He endured at Gethsemane! Think of the strong crying and tears! Think of the Son of God shedding tears!
- Think of Psalm 69, read it – and read it often – the sorrows that were heaped upon Jesus by men whom He had created. Think of the words of One who sought for comforters and found none.
- Think of Psalm 102: its heading reads,
- "A prayer of the afflicted, when he is overwhelmed, and poureth out his complaint before Jehovah".
- Then the psalmist speaks of being taken away in the midst of his days, so that we rightly refer, in speaking of such a subject, to the Lord Jesus Himself.
- In the days of His flesh He offered up strong crying and tears to Him that was able to deliver him out of death. It does not read, 'deliver Him from death'; that was not the thought.
- He went into death to be delivered out of it: the Lord Jesus went all the way. He was indeed the Man of Sorrows, the One whose face was marred more than any man's.
It is a comfort to us that the Lord Jesus has Himself gone before us in this pathway. We never shed a tear but He is ready to help us.
- We sometimes shed tears because we do not get our own way; sometimes we shed tears because of the consequences of our own wilfulness and disobedience.
- Those tears never find a place in God's book, never are treasured in God's bottle. But the tears I speak of all find a place in God's book.
2 Timothy 1
The Scripture in the second epistle to Timothy is a word from an old man to a young one.
- The more I go on in the testimony of Lord the more I value the old men and the old women. Old disciples are valuable.
- We read of one in the Acts, Mnason, an old disciple, and he was found with Paul.
- Even in his old age, at a time when Paul was not popular, this old disciple was found with him, supporting him.
- The young should value the old, even if they have not much gift.
This word, as I said, is addressed to a young man; it would have equal
forced to a young woman.
- Paul thanks God as he thinks about this young man. Are you the cause of thanksgiving amongst the people God? Are they glad in having seen the work of God coming to light in your history?
- I have seen the work of God developing in people of tender age, and I have thanked God for it.
- The work of God can be seen in different gradations, and it is beautiful in every feature. Whether it be just the bud or whether it be the full fruit, the work of God in anyone is a cause of thanksgiving.
- Now Paul in this Scripture says he had remembrance of this young man in his supplications, and he remembered his tears. Had you ever shed tears like these?
- They are very, very precious tears; their value could not be given in money – the value of tears like these! You can shed them at this very
time.
This was written many years ago and yet its application is as strong tonight as when Paul sat down and wrote this letter to his beloved child Timothy.
- Timothy was not weeping about himself; he was weeping about the testimony of the Lord, and I would say to you dear young people, Well you might weep about it.
- As I think of the Lord Jesus speaking to His disciples about one flock, I look over Christendom and I see division and ruin.
- Where is the expression of the one flock? Where do I see all believers in Christ gathered together as one, operating as one body?
- Alas! I see the saints of God scattered in hundreds of sects and schisms all over Christendom.
- There are some denominations where I would not expect to find a Christian, but I can think of many others and know of Christians in them. Why is it they are not altogether?
It is good for the young people to make themselves acquainted with the history of the professing church.
- Read the first two or three chapters of Revelation if you want the inspired account of it.
During the last century there came to light a wonderful revival.
- It began when a young man got an impression that, if there was a Head in heaven, there was a body on earth, and he sought to find the body.
- That led him to get back to the original charter of the church of God and he sought to recognize the great truth of the Head in heaven and the Spirit down here.
- It was the most wonderful revival that ever took place in the assembly
history.
From that time things began to move from two angles: they began to go forward in power as energized by the Spirit of God,
- but the enemy got very busy too and within twenty years there was a division even amongst those who had part in this revival, nor has it
been the last.
- If you were to read the history of the testimony since 1830 you would have much cause to shed tears; if you have not shed a tear or two I am sorry for you.
- You should make yourself acquainted with the history of the testimony that you might be able to shed tears to go into God's bottle.
The decline and division I am speaking about began in Paul's lifetime and yet he is able to indicate that what is of God is going through.
- So be sure you are on the winning side, and commit yourself fully to the testimony of the Lord.
- Persons like you are needed, as was said by the Lord Jesus long ago
about a little colt,
- "The Lord has need of him".
- Let us make sure that we ourselves are going on with Paul. He is the great example for us in the last days.
- He encourages his child, he stimulates him, he says that, even in spite of all that has come in,
- Have you taken your place in the support of the testimony of the Lord?
- The Lord would make a fresh appeal. Do not hesitate, but take your share in the suffering.
Things in the Christian testimony were not (and are not) getting any easier.
- Paul indicates that things will decline and rather get worse, and he says,
- "thou therefore, my child, be strong in the grace which is in Christ Jesus".
- He is able to see the testimony and those connected with it through to the end. Why not have a part in it?
- Paul was not in any doubt as to the end of things. He says,
- "I am not ashamed" because "He is able to keep for that day the deposit I have entrusted to Him".
Let us take account of the situation all around in Christendom.
- Think of the ruin, think of the way man has handled these holy
things, and let us sigh and cry over the ruin.
- Some may say, 'Did not the Lord in Matthew 16 say that nothing would be able to overcome the church?'
- True, but that is the church as built by Christ.
- We have another view of the church as committed to man in 1 Corinthians 3, and all kinds of builders and all kinds of materials are mentioned there. That is why we see around us such confusion.
- Some have built in gold, some silver, some precious stones and some, alas, straw. So let us all be on the line of building, but of building something which will abide.
Psalm 42
Now I go on to Psalm 42. We are moving on in our spiritual history now.
- This psalm is addressed to the Chief Musician, and the experiences recorded result in addition to the praises of God.
- It is an instruction and it is composed by the sons of Korah. A very fine choir were the sons of Korah, but the experiences recorded in this psalm are not happy ones.
- This is the second book of Psalms and in this particular book the children of Israel will find great comfort in a coming day.
- It views the remnant as cast out of Jerusalem, and that is why it says,
- "I remember thee from the land of the Jordan, and the Hermons, from mount Mizar".
- It speaks first of all of the land of the Jordan. We are not very old when we know something of the Jordan.
- I often think of the vessels of Solomon's temple. It says that they were all cast in the clay ground beside the Jordan,
- and we are told in another part of Scripture that every now and then the Jordan overflowed its banks and that kept the ground soft and workable.
- Had the clay been hard they would not have been able to make many vessels. That is an illustration of what God sometimes does in our histories.
- He allows the waters of Jordan to overflow, for as we look on the histories of the children of God they may seem to have more sorrows than anybody else.
Paul knew something about the Jordan. He says,
- "We who live are always delivered unto death on account of Jesus", 2 Corinthians 4: 11.
- It was part of his spiritual instruction. God has to bring us that way in view of forming us for the Father's house.
- So the psalmist speaks of Jordan and then of the Hermons, at the very extremity of the land. We might say he is nearly out of fellowship; then he speaks of mount Mizar, which means 'the little hill'.
- In our histories there are often little hills which cause us much sorrow. They are not great things that others might take account of, but little things which are often the cause of our tears being our bread day and night,
- and the enemy says, Why does not God come in? –
"Where is thy God?"
- It is not that God finds pleasure in putting us through experiences like these; it is a part of the discipline that goes on in His school, and tears shed in this way have an abiding result. They find a place in God's bottle.
Perhaps someone here is passing through a time of sorrow – maybe a
bereavement, as in Bethany.
- The brethren can see that; it is like the Jordan.
- There are other times when only God knows, and that would be like mount Mizar. It is all intended to teach us more of God Himself, to teach us more of His love.
- As the psalmist goes on to say "In the day-time will Jehovah command His loving-kindness, and in the night His song shall be with me". He is beginning to get help now.
- How good to know a God who "giveth songs in the night"!
- Some of the richest contributions to our hymn book were songs in the
night.
- Some of Mr. Darby's hymns were written during times of great
personal sorrow and afflictions, some in the midst of conflicts for the
truth, and they all have a place in God's treasury.
- So this psalm would encourage us, that we might all know God as the One who gives songs, even in the night.
2 Kings 20
Now I speak about Hezekiah. In the account in 2 Chronicles the chapter begins in a remarkable way. It says,
- "After these things and this faithfulness"
- certain things happened in his history, including the attack from the outside and his sickness unto death inside.
- After all his faithfulness, after he had lived a life and been the means of a great revival in Judah – after all that these two things happened which tried him very much:
- the enemy outside the gates and his own sickness inside.
- It says he was sick unto death. It is no light matter to get a message that you are going to die and not live. Sometimes the Lord allows us to have experiences of that kind.
- He knew what Hezekiah had been, yet He allowed him to pass through these circumstances.
There is a another message to him however. Isaiah is to
- "Return and tell Hezekiah the captain of My people …"
- God would assure Hezekiah that He knew all about the matter.
- It was indeed an honour that was paid to Hezekiah, to be called "the captain of My people" by God! Earthly honours are a hindrance to the Christian, but not God's honours.
- God's says, "I have heard thy prayer, I have seen thy tears"
- – they were all being recorded in God's book.
This illness was not by chance; it was not an accident. It all happened in the carefully planned ways of God. So may we be encouraged to see that we are "In every state secure, watched by the Saviour's eye".
- Jehovah says "on the third day thou shalt go up to the house of Jehovah".
- The addition to his life is not mentioned first in Kings, but the fact of his going up to the house of Jehovah on the third day.
- If you want to find out how he went up read chapter 38 of Isaiah, for it shows the gain he got out of all these circumstances.
- At the beginning of the chapter, in his lamentation, he is heart-broken. Everything seems to have gone the opposite way to what he had hoped.
- But then he comes to a point where he says that God has done it. It is a great point in our spiritual history when we see that God's hand is behind things.
From that point Hezekiah begins to get gain and he speaks about going up to Jehovah's house and says,
- "We will play upon my stringed instruments all the days of
our life".
- When a brother has been under discipline others see that he has gained.
- Paul says that at one point he despaired even of living, and he adds that the objective that God had in mind was that he should have his trust in God who raises the dead.
- In all trials let us seek God's mind, let us seek to know why He has allowed the sorrow.
- "He does not willingly afflict or grieve the children of men".
- His desire is that we might acquire a knowledge of Himself that will
remain when the pressure is all gone, when our Mizar is levelled to the ground.
Revelation 21
I finish now with the Scripture in Revelation 21. How good it is
to be able to turn to this Scripture.
- Tears and weeping may be the order of the day now, but we can look forward by faith and by the Spirit's grace and power to a day when the last tear will be shed.
- God will wipe away every tear from our eyes. Think of the blessed God Himself doing that.
- He will wipe away every tear from our eyes. Think of God wanting to enter into our sorrows like that.
- There is not a sorrow that Jesus has not been in before us and is not in with us now. So that we may be quite sure that God would do this service
for us.
- He would enter into our individual sorrows, wiping away every tear, doing it personally.
- He may do it mediately through one and another of the brethren – I would like to be used to wipe away a tear.
This voice then says that
- "death shall not exist anymore, nor grief, nor cry, nor distress shall exist anymore".
- What will exist? The city of God, the city that lies foursquare. All the gain of the sorrows, all that has been treasured up through many tears is in the city.
- At the beginning of John 11, we are told that Lazarus of Bethany was sick, and that Bethany was the village of Mary and Martha; it is said also that
- "it was the Mary who anointed the Lord with ointment",
- as if the Spirit would give us the gain of the sorrow before we have the experiences where the gain came from.
- Where did Mary get the nard? Surely she got it in the sorrow. That is where the pound of ointment is acquired.
- Now in Revelation 21 we have a time where the sorrow and tears will be over for ever.
- The support we have had from Christ on high and from the Comforter here below will result in precious spiritual substance throughout the day of God.
May we be encouraged even if we are found shedding tears in this way!
- Whatever be the cause, the Lord Jesus has something in mind for us; God has something in mind, and that is
- that we may acquire treasure that will abide when the tears, and the sorrow that caused them, will have passed away for ever.
Page Top
CHRISTIAN UNITY AND FELLOWSHIP |
|---|
Deuteronomy 12: 8-14, 26-27;
1 Corinthians 10: 14-22; 2 Timothy 2: 19-22
Summary of a Reading at Belfast, January 13, 1962
Help and Comfort, April 1962, 1: 73-78 |
C.W.C. It was suggested that we should consider the thought of Christian unity and fellowship. The psalmist says
- "Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity"
- but in Christendom we see a sorrowful picture of division and scattering.
- We should recognize our own part in the general breakdown, indeed the
Lord has brought it home to us, in the shaking through which we have recently passed.
- Such experiences often tend to make us despondent, for it would seem that everything we have treasured had gone to pieces, but
- the Lord wants us to re-examine our foundations, particularly our collective foundations.
In John 17, we see now precious to the Lord was this thought of the unity of all His own, for He prayed
- "that they may be all one … that the world may believe".
- This should stimulate prayer and exercise that we might be found walking together in true Christian unity and fellowship, always bearing in mind such thoughts as the one flock, the one body, the one faith, the one Lord, etc.
Deuteronomy 12
In Deuteronomy 12 reference is made, for the first time, to
- the "place which Jehovah your God will choose"
- and it is evident, from the context, that this place was to be the centre of collective spiritual life for all Israel.
- Two dangers are mentioned, firstly, the possibility of each one doing what was right in his own eyes, and secondly, the offering up of sacrifices in every place.
- A somewhat similar warning had already been given in Leviticus
17: 3-5, when Moses had spoken against the formation of what might be called private or independent fellowships.
- There was one place, and only one place where the Israelites could find God's altar, and this was where God had placed His Name.
- This is equally true in this dispensation as it is said in Hebrews 13, "we have an altar".
- The altar suggests the place where God can be approached, and the place where the people could enjoy communion together in the eating of
the sacrifices.
- During the history of the people of Israel, king Jeroboam established a rival altar, and a system of religious observances which, though resembling in some respects what had been set up under Moses, was clearly marked off as being merely of man.
- Many altars have been erected in the history of Christendom, hence the importance of getting back to first principles;
- this is what they did in the days of recovery under Ezra, when it says that they "set the altar on its base".
- We are not called upon to re-organize, nor reform, neither are we commanded to set up anything new;
- the primary concern for us is to discover and hold fast the Divine pattern.
1 Corinthians 10
The epistles to the Corinthians set out God's original thoughts as to Christian unity and fellowship.
- "In the power of one Spirit, we have all been baptised into one body", 1 Corinthians 12: 13.
- This is the ground on which believers came together at the beginning, the Lord's Supper being the outward expression of the fellowship or communion which was based on this unity.
- There is no other ground of gathering today.
- In the Psalms and the prophets we can see how faith always reverted to God's altar, so we, in this day, should ever keep in our thoughts that
- despite the general departure, God would still direct us to the true basis of Christian unity.
- This one fellowship is described in different ways, and the Scripture read in Corinthians has a place of special importance in the consideration of this subject, because
- the instructions there given are intended to regulate our thoughts, outlook, and conduct throughout our responsible history, in view of our partaking of the Lord's Supper as outlined after chapter 11: 17.
"The communion of the blood of the Christ" is an expression which should affect us inwardly, because
- it is a reminder to us of the mighty cost involved before the Christian altar could be established,
- and also before anyone of us could be secured to enjoy this holy fellowship.
- Then "the communion of the body of the Christ" suggests the intimate links we have as sharing together in the privileges and responsibilities of the fellowship.
- This Scripture makes it perfectly clear that as breaking bread and walking together in fellowship we are not doing this as individuals but as in the communion of the altar, and as members of the one body.
- To help us in this the apostle says, "See Israel according to flesh", so that a passage such as we have read in Deuteronomy 12 should enable us to grasp the meaning of communion with the altar.
- Again as to collective responsibility, Joshua 7: 11 could be mentioned, where Jehovah says
- This aspect of collective responsibility still obtains, as can be seen from 2 Corinthians 7: 11 where the apostle says
- "in every way ye have proved yourselves to be pure in the matter".
- "The matter" referred to was a case of sin in the local gathering at Corinth, and all were involved, until they proved themselves clear.
2 Timothy 2
The second letter to Timothy was written in view of days like those in which we find ourselves, and is therefore, of inestimable value to any who desire to walk in the path of the Lord's will in the midst of the confusion.
- Paul's teaching – including Corinthians – had been given up; truth had been displaced by error, and instead of unity there was scattering.
- In such circumstances it becomes a difficult matter to find Christian fellowship.
- It is not now a question of finding a "place" geographically, as the Lord Himself said in John 4: 21
- – "neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem";
- it is now a matter of finding conditions which would be suitable to the Lord's Name:
- "Where two or three are gathered together unto my
name, there am I in the midst of them".
The second chapter of the epistle shows that our first concern
should not be to find the right company; this is a mistake made by
many.
- The first step in this searching exercise is for the individual
believer to purge himself by withdrawing from iniquity and separating
from those who, while they profess the Name of Lord, are nevertheless vessels to dishonour.
- This may involve "sitting alone", Jeremiah 15: 17.
- As the chapter proceeds, however, the apostle says that the believer, having purified himself is to
- "pursue righteousness, faith, love, peace with those that call upon the Lord out of a pure heart".
Having thus outlined a path amidst the ruin, the apostle Paul reminds Timothy that he had been thoroughly acquainted with Paul's teaching, and exhorts him to abide therein –
- this would certainly include the verses in 1 Corinthians 12 regarding unity and fellowship.
- It is rather similar to the Scripture in the very last chapter of the Old Testament,
- "Remember the law of Moses my servant, which I commanded him in Horeb, for all Israel".
- We are not enjoined to set up to something new, but rather are we thrown back on the divine ground of gathering,
- "the communion of the body of Christ".
- This is still the only basis of fellowship.
It is instructive to notice in the history of the kings of Israel that
whatever their own lives had been, there is always a comment by the Spirit, that they did not depart from the sins of Jeroboam.
- We cannot therefore ignore the history connected with the setting up of these rival altars;
- even during the past 150 years certain companies have come into existence, and we should make ourselves acquainted with their origins.
- The Lord alone can guide His servants aright, and even after the exercises outlined in this chapter, we need peculiar grace to be preserved from what is sectarian.
Page Top
| THE SON OF GOD |
|---|
No Date
This article appears to have been written rather than being an address. It is an excellent summary of the truth of The Sonsdip of Christ. The references to the Newberry Bible* have not been verified. |
| * "Thomas Newberry (born 1811, died January 16, 1901) was an English Bible scholar and writer, most well-known for his interlinear Englishman's Bible, which compared the Authorised Version of the Bible to the Hebrew and Koine Greek of the original texts, first published in 1886". From Wikipedia.
Mr. Newberry was with those commonly known as "open". GAR
|
In both the Old and the New Testaments there is great variety in the names and titles given to the Saviour, our Lord Jesus Christ, and each of these presents some distinct feature of His glory, His greatness, His grace and compassion.
- Believers will find much spiritual food in meditating upon these different names, seeking to understand, by the help of the Holy Spirit, something of their import,
- for in so doing they will surely grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as we read in 2 Peter 3: 18.
It may be said, without fear of contradiction, that there is one name which appeals to every believer, irrespective of age, and that is the precious Name of Jesus; how rightly we sing
"How sweet the Name of Jesus sounds
In a believer’s ear.
It soothes his sorrows, heals his wounds,
And drives away his fear."
Never could we exhaust the blessedness of the Name of Jesus, which ever suggests lowliness, meekness, gentleness and grace, but we can also rejoice that at that Name every knee shall bow, for He is King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
In the gospel of John the Names “Son of God” and “The Son” have a prominent place, and the Apostle’s object in writing was that we might know that
- “Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.” John 20: 31
- This same Apostle also presents Christ as the Sent One, a remarkable title which calls for reverent enquiry on our part.
- Before developing his theme, John states some cardinal truths concerning the One of whom he was about to write.
1. In this he was divinely guided, for the opening verse of his gospel is outstanding both for its brevity and depth: it contains facts which are of the utmost importance in our apprehension of Christian doctrine.
- “In [the] beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God”.
- Let it be clearly understood that he does not say “in the beginning He was the Word”. No, but what he states emphatically is
- the eternal existence, the distinct personality, and the Deity of our Lord Jesus Christ.
- According to the best translations the definite article [the] should be omitted in the first clause; “in the beginning” would direct the mind to some definite point of time, whereas “in beginning” is intentionally indefinite, and implies that however far one may go back, this Person “was”.
- According to the Notes concerning the tenses in the Newberry Bible, this word “was” indicates continuance in the past so that we are to understand that the One of whom the Apostle never had a beginning.
- How marvellous to contemplate that He who was here in the form of a Servant, was before all things. He always Was.
2. The second statement in this first verse of John’s Gospel is
- “the Word was with God”
and as if to emphasise this point, the Writer adds in verse 2 ,
“the Same was in the beginning with God”.
- Even before the last of the Apostles had died several erroneous doctrines had been circulated. One such idea was that Christ had developed from the Godhead at some unknown time;
- John meets this with the positive assertion that the Lord Jesus Christ was always a distinct Person; He was not an emanation from Deity.
3. The third clause of verse 1 in this gospel states “the Word was God”. Glorious truth!
- Some modernists would teach that the Word was a God; this is error.
- The Lord Jesus was not a subordinate person in the Godhead, but every attribute of the Deity belonged to Him – omnipotence, omnipresence, omniscience, and immortality, all were His.
- No human mind can comprehend the greatness and majesty of Deity
- for “God dwells in light which no man can approach unto, Whom no man has seen nor can see”, 1 Timothy 6: 16.
- We are only finite creatures, but God is infinite.
- “God is great and we know Him not, neither can the number of His years be searched out”, Job 36: 26.
- For our knowledge of God we are dependent on the revelation He has given, as we read
- “No one has seen God at any time, the only-begotten Son who is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him”, John 1: 18, JND translation.
In our seeking after the truth we must keep in mind the three points of John’s first verse:
- the everlasting existence of Christ,
- His distinct personality
- and His eternal deity.
In addition to what has just come before us in John’s gospel there is another matter which requires holy care with us, lest we unwittingly carry back certain names of the Lord Jesus, and their implications, as if such names always applied to Him; reverence and humility become us in looking into such holy matters. We read in John 3: 13
- A casual reader might assume that the Lord was Son of Man prior to His incarnation but it is clear that this title could not apply to Christ until His actual incarnation. Another reference will help. In 1 Timothy 1: 15 we read
- “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners”.
- This is described as a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation – happy are those who have accepted it – but we must not infer that He was known by this title before His incarnation. This name is used here to designate One now known to us by this familiar title.
Throughout the Old Testament, the incarnation was ever in view and His advent was always looked forward to by various writers; but 1 Peter 1: 12 enables us to see that these prophets sought out the bearing of their ministry and to them it was revealed that their service had another day in view – their ministry had our day in view
- Proverbs 30: 4 is another example of one who spoke of precious truths which awaited the incoming of Christ for their fulfilment. What a moment it was then for all mankind when at last it could be said,
- “Unto you is born this day in the city of David, a Saviour which is Christ the Lord”, Luke 2: 11.
- And may we not add what a moment it was for God when He could at last declare
- “Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten Thee”, Psalm 2: 7.
- As John and the other apostles contemplated His glory the only way he could describe it was
- “the glory as of an only begotten with a father”.
- It is manifest that this is what these men saw of the holy intimacy between Christ and His Father here on earth.
In connection with this profound matter of the Sonship of the Lord Jesus there are four passages of scripture which should claim our attention, especially as they were all uttered by the Lord Himself.
- First in John 5: 19 it is recorded that the Lord said
“The Son can do nothing of Himself”.
- Secondly He said in verse 28 of the same chapter
“The Father … hath given to the Son to have life in Himself”.
- Thirdly the Lord said in John 14: 28
“My Father is greater than I”
- and lastly the Lord said in Mark 14: 32
“Of that day and that hour knoweth no man; no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son”.
- It is abundantly clear that not one of these statements could apply to the Lord as in pre-incarnate Deity: they are not consistent with the greatness, power and wisdom which belonged to Him as in the form of God.
- It would be derogatory to the glory of One who was the Everlasting God to suggest, or even think that He could do nothing of Himself, or that the Father was greater than the Son as in Deity.
- They are consistent with the place He took in manhood, the Servant that Isaiah calls attention to in Isaiah 42.
There will be much confusion of thought if we were to assume that the names and titles taken by the Lord in His lowly incarnation describe His position as in eternal Deity.
- Our apprehension of His glory will be enlarged as we view Him as the Self-Existent One, Who was and is
- “God blessed for ever”, Romans 9: 5.
- In these matters, the scriptures, not tradition, must be our guide. We should pay special attention to the Angel’s words to Mary when announcing the Saviour’s birth in Luke 1: 31,
- “Thou shalt call His name Jesus”.
Later he said “He shall be called ‘The Son of the Highest’ “,
and then in verse 36
“that Holy Thing also which shall be born shall be called Son of God”.
- As already remarked these titles apply to the Lord Jesus as born here on earth.
- It is also noteworthy that scripture speaks of the Holy Spirit as sent down from heaven – 1 Peter 1: 12 – but we do not read of Christ sent in this way, whereas several scriptures speak of Him as coming from heaven. This raises the question of Christ as the Sent One.
Concerning John the Baptist we read “there was a man sent from God, whose name was John”, John 1: 6.
- He had been in the desert in secret with God until the day of his showing to Israel – Luke 1: 80 – then he came forth as “Sent” to take up his divinely given service.
- Anyone sending another is vested with authority, but subjection and obedience are suitable features in the one who is sent. Such ideas do not exist in relation to Divine Persons as in Godhead, where all are equal, but they do come into the lowly place taken by the Son in His relations with His Father as we see in the beautiful words of Psalm 16
- “O my soul, Thou hast said to Jehovah ‘Thou art my Lord, my greatness extendeth not to Thee’ ”.
- Such was the attitude taken up by the Lord Jesus here on earth, having willingly accepted a position where He could be sent by the Father.
The idea of the Lord being sent was in the counsels of God in the past, but it was not until He was thirty years of age that He took up His service, after that the Father had publicly declared His delight in the unrecorded years of secret history.
- There are two scriptures which bear on this.
- Firstly is John 3: 16 “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes on Him may not perish but have life eternal”.
- Further in 1 John 4: 9 we read “God sent His only begotten Son into the world that we might live through Him”.
- We know from the first verse in John’s gospel that the Lord ever “was” so that the title “only begotten Son” must refer to the Lord as incarnate.
- The Father could not send His only begotten Son from heaven, for He was not begotten until He was born in Bethlehem.
- When taking leave of His disciples He said in John 17
- “and now I am no longer in the world”.
- Having undertaken and completed the work given he speaks as being no longer in the world. This helps us to understand the Lord saying He was no longer in the world: His service was over, though in actual fact He was standing with His own.
- According to Luke’s gospel, the Lord took up his service when He had reached the Levitical age, thirty years, when the Holy Spirit came upon Him, as we read
- “Jesus, who was of Nazareth. How God anointed Him with the Holy Spirit and with power”, Acts 10: 38.
It is generally acknowledged that the title “Eternal Son” never occurs in either the Old or New Testament, but some are of the opinion that this idea is supported by several scriptures.
- The eighth chapter of Proverbs is often quoted in this connection, but the speaker is feminine so she could not be the Eternal Son; further she speaks as “brought forth” and thus she is not eternal.
Isaiah 9: 6 is also referred to, and indeed it is often “unto us the Son is given”. We read “unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given”.
- It will be a gross mistake if we try to suggest that this brings in eternal relations between the Father and the Son, for it primarily refers to what the repentant remnant will find in Christ in a coming day.
- The Child born could be a son or a daughter, hence the prophet adds “Unto us a Son is given”.
- Christ will indeed be the Heir – Micah 1: 15 – and according to these verses in Isaiah is in every way qualified to take up the government which will be upon His shoulder, and will eventually bring in universal peace.
Next, the mention of Son of God in Daniel 3: 25 has led some to assume that even in the Old Testament times Christ was known as the Son. However, the more correct wording is that the fourth person was like “a son of the gods”.
- It is difficult to think that in a country where the true God was unknown, Christ was already known by the heathen. We can understand, however, that the Babylonish monarch in his consternation might suppose that the fourth person was a son of one of their many gods.
In Acts 13: 33 we read in the Authorised version that God “hath raised up Jesus again as it is written in the second Psalm ' Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten Thee' ”.
- It has been suggested that the title “Son” has a special reference to the Lord in resurrection. Here again there is an error in translation: the word “again” should not be there
- It is omitted in JND’s translation, also in Nestlé’s Greek/English New Testament, while in the Newberry Bible it states that the word “again” is superfluous.
- In the past judges had been raised up, David had been raised up, so Jesus was raised up according to Deuteronomy 18: 18 when God said to Moses
- “I will raise up a prophet from among their brethren”.
- Adverting to the 13th chapter of Acts we read in verse 34 “and as concerning that He raised Him up from the dead”. In this remark it is clear that the resurrection is in view.
In the opening verses of the epistle to the Hebrews it is said that the Lord Jesus “hath by inheritance a more excellent Name than the angels”.
- The word “inherit” means to come into possession of something not previously possessed. The scripture continues “For unto which of the angels said He at any time, 'Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten Thee' ”. So that the more excellent Name which our Saviour inherited is none other than that of Son.
In chapter 7 of the Hebrews it is said that Melchisedec was made like unto the Son of God and it has been suggested that this proves that Christ was the Eternal Son.
- This view is untenable, because the point of the teaching is that the priesthood of Melchisedec, unlike that of the sons of Aaron, did not depend upon his ancestry, but rather upon his personal greatness: he had no genealogy, nor do we read anything of his father or mother.
- As has been said the chapter emphasises the personal excellence of this priest of the most High God. It is in this respect that he was made like to the Son of God, for He did not belong to the priestly tribe of Levi but because of His own majesty He has been called of God to be High Priest for ever.
As we consider the Father’s delight in His Son during the thirty years of secret history, then in those years when He was anointed and sent forth in service, we are enabled to grasp, in some measure, the immensity of the sacrifice when
- “God spared not His own Son but delivered Him up for us all”.
- Never before upon this earth had there been a life like that of the Lord Jesus, yet that life, so sinless, so spotless, so pleasing to His Father must be given up in sacrifice in order to effect this great redemption.
- “The redemption of their soul is precious and ceaseth [or, must be given up] for ever”, Psalm 49: 8.
- In Genesis 22 a substitute appeared but at Golgotha there was no substitute as we read
- “Who His own Self bore our sins in His body on the tree”, 1 Peter 2: 24.
- That life of flesh and blood has been given up for ever. What a day it will be when our glorious Saviour will see the fruit of the travail of His soul, and shall be satisfied. The sacrifice will not be in vain.
Before concluding it may be helpful to refer again to John 1: 18
- “no one has seen God at any time, but the only begotten Son, Who is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him”.
- It has been assumed that this verse refers to the eternal relations between the Father and the Son, but sober consideration of this verse will show that as the Only-begotten Son is mentioned, this must refer to the Lord as here in manhood.
- The verb used is not in the past tense, but in the present. The introduction to the Newberry Bible emphasises the importance of tenses, and in the page illustrating this the writer observes that the word “in” involves “motion towards”.
One further remark demands our attention. If there was a special link between the Father and the Son in a past eternity then the Spirit was not in this relationship, and the truth that all Three were eternally equal could not be maintained. The Third Person, the Spirit of God was outside this supposed affinity.
In view of what has been set out in these scriptures which we have considered many believers refrain from using the expression “the Eternal Son” for no such title is ever applied to the Lord from Genesis to Revelation.
- That this glorious Person existed from all eternity is fully recognised, so He is honoured as the great “I AM”, the Eternal One.
- As creatures we cannot pretend to fathom the infinitude of Deity, nor are we qualified to describe the relations between Divine Persons prior to incarnation. We do know that however far we go back love was there.
“The hidden things belong to Jehovah our God, but the revealed ones are ours and our children’s for ever”, Deuteronomy 29: 29.
Page Top
| CLEAVING |
|---|
2 Kings 18: 6; Ruth 1: 14; Acts 17: 33-34; 2 Samuel 20:2; Genesis 2: 24
Revised Notes of an Address at
Bournemouth, September 8, 1962
This article is from a pamphlet published by Philip Haddad. The editing is not up to Mr. Haddad's usual standard but, – except for a few obvious errors – has been allowed to stand. GAR |
It must be manifest, brethren, to any exercised believers at the present time, that we are not in the Pentecostal days of Church history. Our lot has been cast in the last days, not the first;
- consequently we are in days of extraordinary difficulty, because the Church as committed to man's responsibility has completely failed.
- Anyone who suggests otherwise must be extremely foolish because we see around us that which speaks of confusion, of ruin, and of disorder
- In case anyone should be surprised by these statements I would remind you that whatever has been committed to man has always broken down. That is an axiom that stands true from Genesis to Revelation.
- Whenever man is put in any position of responsibility he breaks down and breaks down very quickly. On the other hand, whatever God puts His hand to, He will carry through.
In view of the discord and ruin of Christendom, I wish to speak tonight, beloved brethren, of things that I want to cling to through thick and thin, and I want to encourage all the brethren here to cling to them likewise.
- I begin with the reference to King Hezekiah – a very godly king – and he is introduced to us when he is comparatively young – at 25 years old. That is not too old, yet he is brought forward in a most becoming way, and we would say to the young people here that you could not begin too young in this path.
- You will have noticed that it is persons, and what is set forth in these persons, I want you to cleave to; but the first it tells us about Hezekiah is that he did what was right in the sight of the Lord. I could not commend anything better to you; let it be your aim and ambition through life, to do what is right.
- You know, a hundred and one questions that arise in your daily lives could be settled very simply if we just followed the rule, ‘Is it right?’
- It is not difficult to know. If you are going on simply, desiring to please the Lord, reading the Scriptures, and going with God’s people, then it will not be a difficult matter as temptations are presented to know what is right and what is wrong. Almost the last thing Paul says to the Corinthians is to tell them that he was praying that they would do what is right.
Following upon that, we read, that “he trusted in Jehovah, the God of Israel”, verse 5. That is, Hezekiah had a personal history with God, and he knew Him as the God of Israel. He recognized Him as his own God, but he claims God in relation to all His people
- It is an important thing to remember that in all the ruin around, God has His thoughts of how His people should be regulated. If man has ruined things, God has not changed. So that we want to fall back on that, on the God of Israel, that is, God in relation to His own thoughts and in relation to all His people.
- In the last book in the Old Testament Malachi urges the people of Israel at that time to,
- “Remember the law of Moses which he commanded for all Israel”.
- He did not command a certain law for law for one section of His people, and [another] law for another section, His law stood in relation to all Israel. Hezekiah is moving on this line, then it tells us in the verse we read,
- “and he clave to Jehovah”.
- Now in your career as a believer many things will come in to divert you from the Lord, but whatever happens, dear young people, let nothing divert you from acting as did Hezekiah in a difficult and dark day, “he clave to the Lord”.
In the New Testament we read of Barnabas going down to a gathering of young Christians and he exhorted them,
- “to cleave to the Lord [or abide with the Lord] with purpose of heart”.
- Now these are very, very important features if we are to be preserved amidst the ruin, because there is still a path in which the servant of the Lord can tread in faithfulness to his Master.
- So there is this encouraging word as to Hezekiah that he clave to the Lord, and did not turn aside from following Him but he kept His commandments which Jehovah commanded Moses.
- You see, he is not doing just what he thought right in his own eyes, though that seems a very expedient way of acting in the difficulties, but he fell back on the commandments that God had given through Moses.
- Paul say, in writing to Titus, that the elder must cling to the faithful word, so that Hezekiah is cleaving to the Lord and is also regulated by Scripture, as we would say.
- Now, beloved young people, it will be a safe rule in your pathway if you cleave to the Lord and are regulated by His Word – the law hidden in your heart, that you might not sin against the Lord.
So, we should each have it in mind, that if there is no collective position in our towns, we each want to be regulated by the truth, and we desire, as far as we individually are concerned, to be cleaving to the Lord with purpose of heart.
The next passage I read presents a rather different situation. I read from the book of Ruth, and the circumstances are well known, I judge, to all the brethren;
- it might be well to say that Naomi in this chapter represents the remnant of Israel in a coming day, that is the primary interpretation of the passage.
- However, I believe we would also be right in saying that Naomi represents the testimony. She does not represent Christ personally because no woman in Scripture, so far as I am aware, is ever used as a type of the Lord,
- but Naomi represents what is here for Christ in testimony, and as we see in this chapter there is not very much outwardly to attract people to Naomi. She is a widow, she has nothing to offer her followers, so there comes a challenge,
- Now perhaps that challenge has reached you in your locality; it has reached me in mine, it has reached others. A challenge comes as to whether we are willing to go with this outwardly weak situation;
- Naomi has to admit the government of God had come in, and that is what we have to admit, beloved brethren; the government of God has come in and for young people who want to identify themselves with the testimony to day, it does not seem a very bright prospect. We do not want you to be under any delusion as to that, for the test is sure to arise.
Now, one of her daughters-in-law expressed a good deal of affection for her; she kissed her, they lifted up their voice and wept.
- Outwardly there seemed to be a fair amount of affection for the mother-in law; but alas, Orpah went back to her people and her gods.
- On the other hand, however, it says that Ruth “clave to her” – she clave to her mother-in law.
- Now, the test will come, maybe it has come; the challenge is constantly arising – are we going to go on with the testimony? It would be better to go on with a situation of outward weakness than to go back to Moab, let me assure you of that,
- How could you go back to the world that hates the Saviour? How could you go back to systems in which the Spirit is set aside?
Well, Ruth is not on that line, she is cleaving to her mother-in law, and we want to have such a link with the testimony of the Lord that although things are small and the pathway does not seem very attractive, we may be cleaving to that testimony, wherever we are.
- There is a reward ahead, as Ruth found; there is a mighty man of wealth.
- We can also say the Spirit is watching; He observes what is happening in the little gatherings of the saints. He knows the newcomers, and their preparedness, their steadfastness; all this is noted by Him.
- Let our firm decision then be that we are going on with the testimony, however small it may be; throw your lot whole-heartedly with the people of God who are accepting the reproach of Christ.
There is no possibility of the whole Church being again gathered here on earth, despite talks today about church unity.
- Let us go on after Christ and the testimony of the Lord, however small it may be. If you stand by the testimony in your locality you will be richly rewarded for the Lord will stand with you and will bring you into a sphere of great wealth.
- Ruth very quickly found that, for she came into a sphere where there were young men and maidens, and they were reaping. In the harvest fields of the true Boaz, a good opportunity exists for young people to engage in the service of their Lord and Master, a very blessed Master He is.
- So as committing yourself wholly to the testimony you will find life and joy in the Master’s service. We urge upon you then, cleave to the testimony of our Lord for He has need of you in relation to His testimony.
In the 17th chapter of Acts it says that some men joining themselves to him, that is Paul, believed.
- In the Authorised Version, it say, “some men clave unto him”; and the word used here is translated by J.N.D. elsewhere in this sense – for example in Romans 12 he says "Abhorring evil, cleaving to good”.
- It is the same word here in the original, so that I am using this Scripture to suggest that we cleave to Paul. Paul represents something; and it says of those men that they joined themselves to him, or clave unto him, and believed. Notice the way it is put.
- I would have said ‘they believed, and then joined themselves to Paul’. But the Spirit of God is showing the importance of standing by Paul; that is why He puts the thought of cleaving first.
- “Some men, joining themselves [or, cleaving], to him, believed”,
- among whom was this noted man Dionysius and a woman named Damaris.
Now what is it to abide with Paul, to join with Paul? That is the next point.
- When I think of Paul I think of him as the great architect of the assembly. The twelve apostles had their place under the Lord, but Paul was a special vessel. He is called an elect vessel, and he was selected by the Spirit to be the architect of the assembly.
- And when Paul wrote to his child Timothy in a day similar to our own he urged him to abide in all that Paul had taught. He says, in 2nd Timothy.
- “Abide in those things which thou hast learned and of which thou hast been fully persuaded, knowing of whom thou hast learned them”.
- Timothy was fully acquainted with Paul’s teaching, and if you are meeting with a company of believers that is not patterned after Paul’s teaching, then I would say you should consider what is being said now.
- Paul would ever keep us in mind of the importance of the Assembly. The Assembly was the great light committed to him, that is the light that is to govern us today – true recovery is to the light of the Assembly.
Then, there are all the other Epistles of Paul, Corinthians for instance; and if I cling to Paul I cleave to Corinthians. I do not give up the teaching as to the communion of the Body of Christ.
- I do not need to go into all the error that is abroad in Christendom; I need to know what Paul says, and Paul teaches that all believers who have the Spirit are members of the Body of Christ, all baptised into one Body.
- Now that light is to govern me, in my outlook. I may only link on with half a dozen in my town; but I can look over the whole world, and I can see that Scripture does make me a member of the Body of Christ, and I am not going to give up that thought.
Paul tells us also about the House of God, and that keeps me balanced.
- Some might say, 'If we are members of the Body of Christ that means that we can break bread with all Christians’.
- Oh no; I have also to be regulated by the truth of the House of God and that brings in the matter of conduct – that is the first Epistle to Timothy. If a man is going on in sin, I cannot walk with him if I want to maintain the holiness that becomes God’s House.
- That brings in the question of conduct, and Paul writes to Timothy in his first Epistle in order that he might know how one ought to conduct oneself in God’s House, which is the pillar and base of the Truth.
- We want to be governed in our localities by the truth of the Body and also by the truth of God’s House, and, as working out those thoughts today, it implies the truth of 2nd Timothy 2, that we pursue righteousness, faith, love, peace.
Now Paul would have us cleave to all these things. Cleaving to Paul, means that I am not surrendering any of the truth as taught by him, and Paul, as I have emphasised, was specially gifted to outline the light to regulate us in this dispensation.
- About 15 years ago, I remember Mr. James Taylor made the remark that, ‘in times of difficulty, we should go to Paul’.
The next Scripture I read was in relation to David in 2 Samuel 20. In case the younger people here are not acquainted with the circumstances of this chapter, I would say that a little while before this, David, the rightful king, had been set aside by a usurper – Absalom.
- He managed to get himself into the place of kingship, but at this point that matter had been more or less resolved, when suddenly when suddenly another difficulty presents itself. We need not be surprised at that in our day.
- As long as the Assembly is down here, the enemy will be busy and ready to attack wherever there is any person or persons standing in the light of what I have been speaking of already.
- Persons who are cleaving to the Lord, persons who are cleaving to the testimony, and persons who are cleaving to Paul will ever be the object of attack. Let us not be deceived by thinking that we will have a peaceful time from now till the Lord comes; we shall not unless we give up the Truth,
- We may be quite sure of this, that if the enemy is defeated at one point he will soon make another attack. That has always been the enemy’s way.
- An attack was made in 1845 relating to the Person of Christ, and just as it seemed to be getting more or less resolved another far greater crisis arose at a place called Bethesda Chapel in Bristol.
The same thing has happened in our time, beloved; so that this chapter has a present bearing upon us at the present moment; the enemy having been defeated in one point, is making another attack.
- It tells us in the beginning of the chapter that there happened to be there, a man of Belial. You will find that when there is friction amongst brethren, there always happens to be there a man of Belial.
The enemy will very quickly take advantage of any such situation; and so
- he says, “We have no portion in David, neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse …”
- and then the men of Israel went up from after David, following Sheba the son of Bichri.
- Another rival to the king comes on the scene just when you would not have expected it: and going on down the chapter, it says in verse 14
- “Sheba the son of Bichri, who went through all the tribes of Israel”
- – another thing that indicates the enemy is at work.
The enemy is never content to keep things in a locality, he wants to spread things in all the tribes of Israel. Is that not what the enemy is doing now? Let us not be deceived.
- It says of the people of God that they are not ignorant of the enemy’s thoughts. What an advantage that gives the saints;
- ministry that the Lord gives amongst His people should draw attention not only to where the Lord is and what the Lord is doing, but where the enemy is and what the enemy is doing.
- And at this present juncture, beloved brethren, the enemy is trying to get into all the tribes of Israel. He is trying to spread matters throughout many localities all over the world. But it says, in the verse read,
- “But the men of Judah clave to their king, from the Jordan even to Jerusalem”.
What are we going to do in the present emergency? Let us cleave to our King!
- As we go down the chapter, Joab comes to our notice, and Joab is rather ruthless. Nevertheless, he speaks what is right at one point and you have to listen to a man who speaks what is right.
- Now let us get matters right about Sheba. Joab says, “a man of mount Ephraim”, verse 21. You see, Ephraim had been set aside, but
- “a man of mount Ephraim, Sheba the son of Bichri by name, has lifted up his hand against the king”.
- You see, there is an issue involved in this matter. This is not just some local squabble. Somebody has lifted up his hand against the king.
- That is a serious matter, beloved brethren, if somebody has lifted up his hand against the king, against David. You see, how that should appeal to every lover of David.
- Think of what Israel owed David, the beloved. I do not think there is any man spoke of so much as being loved – and, of course his name means beloved.
- So that Joab says that one has lifted up his hand against the king, against David. It means in our day, that someone is raising his hand against the One who has loved me and gave Himself for me; somebody is challenging His rights.
That is what is involved, and if that is how matters stand in any locality, let us cleave to our King.
- Matters arise in localities from time to time, and behind them there is an issue. ‘I do not want conflict, I am tired of it’.
- Nevertheless, if someone is going to raise their hand against the King, I trust I will not fail Him. where would I be tonight had not the Lord Jesus died for my soul?
- Do you think it would be right in a matter that affects His rights that I should stand neutral?
- The Lord’s rights will always be challenged; until the end there will be conflict, but we want to urge upon you tonight to stand loyal to the King who has done so much for all His people.
- We do not want localities blotted out, but we should not allow the enemy to get through the tribes.
- Once the matter is taken up in a locality, the Lord comes in, that is important. In God’s land, about which we were speaking today, things are not left undermined – some locality is responsible, some locality can take matters up, and as sure as they do the Lord will be with them.
So this mother in Israel appears, and she shows how matters stand and it says that
- she “went to all the people in her wisdom”.
The thing is brought to an issue.
- “They cut off the head of Sheba the son of Bichri, and cast it to Joab”.
And then it says after that, "he blew a trumpet and they dispersed from the city … And Joab returned to Jerusalem to the king”
- Now that is the finish to this difficult situation. Joab returns to Jerusalem. Jerusalem for us represents the idea of the Assembly, and Joab returns to that and to the king; his rights have been maintained notwithstanding the difficulty and so matters can proceed.
- Now these things are happening around us. The rights of the Lord are being challenged in different localities and, I would say to the brethren that we cannot allow things to drift indefinitely.
- Let us cleave to our King, and let us ever have in mind that the true issue of every crisis is what is set out here, to return to or uphold the Assembly position and be ever loyal to our King.
Now just a closing word on this passage in Genesis. The Scripture says,
- “Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife”.
- That was written a long time ago, many years ago. Does it apply today? It does; let us have no delusions about the Scripture.
- Did the Lord teach differently about marriage? Well, He goes into the matter in the Gospels. In Matthew 19, for instance, He does not suggest any such change;
- He never suggests a wife would leave her husband, and He does not suggest a husband should leave his wife. He goes back to the beginning. He goes back to this very Scripture.
- They referred to Moses, what Moses allowed in the way of divorce, but the Lord says, “in view of your hard-heartedness”. Who wants to be on that line?
- The Lord says, “in the beginning it was not so”.
- He refers to this point about a man leaving his father and mother and cleaving to his wife.
- ‘Perhaps Paul brings in something different’, you say. In 1 Corinthians 7 Paul takes up the question of the marriage bond, and this is what he says in relation to it,
- “To the married, I enjoin, not I but the Lord, Let not the wife be separated from her husband, and let not husband leave wife”.
- Do we want anything more, brethren?
The truth as to marriage is gone to pieces in the world, alas; these very Scriptures are being manipulated and misinterpreted, even by some Christians.
- In Romans 7, it says that a wife is bound by the law to her husband, as long as he lives, and we want to hold to that.
- A man leaves his father and mother and cleaves to his wife. The thing is to keep by the Scripture; cleave to your wife, dear brother, and to the wife I say, cleave to your husband. Let not the husband leave wife, and let not the wife leave the husband. Paul says it, and he adds,
- He gives his own judgment. 1 Corinthians 7 is a most precious chapter from many points of view, and one of them at least is, that Paul distinguishes between what he says as his own judgment as a spiritual man, and what he says by inspiration under the commandment of the Lord.
- Now, in relation to his judgment, even though spiritual, he does not bind any; but as to what the Lord says, that is the commandment of the Lord; that is how it stands.
- He says, “Not I, but the Lord, Let not wife be separated from husband, and let not husband leave wife”.
Let us cling to these thoughts; let us hold faithfully to the marriage bond, not getting involved in the sin of fornication, we speak very practically. Paul says, “flee fornication”.
- So then may we be found cleaving faithfully in relation to all these matters of which I have spoken.
May the Lord bless the word, for His Name’s sake.
Page Top